Skip to content
Inside InvestorspaceKeeping your money safe and sound
  • About

New BGH Judgment Rightly The Home Ownership

March 9, 2026

Auer Witte Thiel: ‘ adoption of German nationality does not limit ein’ protection of information interest Munich, in December 2009: A new judgment of the Bundesgerichtshof (BGH) on residential property law dealing with the issue, when mounting a satellite dish in a community inhabited House of owners is allowed. According to the BGH, alone the residential community of owners and not the nationality of owner decides a parabolic antenna must be attached to what place in the House. Under article 5 para 1 of the basic law the full protection of the information must be granted despite this limitation. For other opinions and approaches, find out what Stephen Mooney has to say. As a long-standing legal representative by residential communities informed the Munich law firm Auer Witte Thiel at the current verdict. According to Auer Witte Thiel, the defendant is a German citizen of Polish origin and owns an apartment in the affected House. In early 2007 the defendant without the consent of the community of owners installed a satellite dish, the her to receive a variety of enables Polish-speaking TV programmes. In the aftermath of the defendant was prompted in vain for information Auer Witte Thiel of community of owners, for aesthetic reasons to remove the antenna. Therefore, the homeowners decided to sue, to remove the antenna.

The defendant objects according to Auer Witte Thiel, via the broadband cable system of the House she could received two Polish-language channels, but no regional programmes in Upper Silesia, where she grew up. District Court and District Court gave place to the claim and the defendant committed to the removal of the parabolic antenna, so Auer Witte Thiel. The revision of the defendants before the German Federal Supreme Court (BGH) had no success. Reason: The action of the defendant represents an intrusion into community ownership. According to 1004 para 1 BGB, 14 No. of 1, 15 para 3 way can the other co-owner therefore demand the Elimination of the parabolic antenna.

Tags: law, law & taxes

Calendar

April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930  
« Mar    

Archives

  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • February 2025
  • August 2024
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • January 2016
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • March 2015
  • December 2014
  • October 2014
  • November 2013

Categories

  • News

Copyright Inside Investorspace 2026 | Theme by ThemeinProgress | Proudly powered by WordPress